The results show that baseline characteristics were only loosely correlated with the number of logins, completed monitoring assessments, page hits, and forum visits, while stronger associations were found with the more intense parts of the intervention (forum posts and chat participations). In addition, age was correlated with utilization between rspearman=.17 (age ? logins) and rspearman=.25 (age ? forum visits; all p < .01). 1.
The correlations out of Bmi which have usage was less than
Most of the correlations out-of Body mass index with utilization was basically less than
Most of the correlations from Bmi that have use was indeed lower than
All the correlations of Bmi with usage have been below
Most of the correlations from Body mass index having application had been lower than
All the correlations regarding Body mass index with utilization had been below
The correlations out-of Bmi that have usage have been lower than
Most of the correlations from Body mass index having utilization had been lower than
All correlations regarding Body mass index that have application was in fact below
Most of the correlations from Body mass index that have usage were less than
All correlations from Body mass index which have application have been below
All correlations from Bmi that have utilization was basically below
Every correlations out-of Bmi having utilization had been less than
Every correlations out of Bmi which have use was basically less than
Most of the correlations of Body mass index having use have been lower than
Every correlations from Body mass index that have usage have been below
All correlations away from Bmi with utilization was indeed below
Total(N = step three,548) | School(N = 2,739) | Online connect(Letter = 255) | Needed by the friend(Letter = 141) | Flyer/poster(Letter = 118) | Most other (Letter = 295) | Shot statistics | p | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note. Logins = quantity of logins so you can ProYouth; Monitorings = number of done overseeing surveys; Message board posts = number of benefits on the message board; Chats = participation for the on the web guidance cam training (group otherwise individual); Page hits = number of pages accessed regarding the participant area (i. e., immediately following sign on); Forum check outs = quantity of profiles utilized regarding forum (i. age., once log in); IQR= inter quartile Variety; * = median decide to try. | ||||||||||
Logins* | M (Md [IQR]) | step 3.9 (0 [0–1]) | step 1.step three (1 [0–1]) | thirteen.4 (2 [1–5]) | 20.4 (1 [1–3]) | 6.2 (step 1 [0–3]) | eleven.3 (step 1 [0–4]) | ?2(4) = 327.six | <.001 | |
Monitorings* | Meters (Md [IQR]) | 1.step 3 (0 [0–1]) | 0.eight (0 (0–0]) | step three.9 (step 1 [0–3]) | 2.six (0 [0–2]) | dos.5 (0 [0–2]) | step three.7 (step 1 [0–3]) | ?2(4) = 308.6 | <.001 | |
Community forum posts | % | 3.step three | 1.cuatro | 11.cuatro | nine.9 | 5.step 1 | ten.dos | ?2(4) = 150.2 | <.001 | |
Chats | % | step 3.0 | step 1.step one | ten.dos | 11.4 | 8.5 | 7.8 | ?2(4) = 150.7 | <.001 | |
Webpage moves* | M (Md [IQR]) | 34.step 1 (cuatro [0–15]) | a dozen.8 (2 [0–11]) | 129.seven (19 [2–53]) | 116.0 (13 [3–34]) | 63.4 (11 [0–28]) | 98.8 (fifteen smooch bezpЕ‚atna aplikacja [0–39]) | ?2(4) = 223.6 | <.001 | |
Forum check outs* | Meters (Md [IQR]) | 5.5 (0 [0–0]) | 1.1 (0 [0–0]) | 21.dos (step 1 [0–7]) | twenty-seven.cuatro (0 [0–3]) | 8.9 (0 [0–2]) | 21.0 (0 [0–3]) | ?2(4) = 585.dos | <.001 | |
Gender | WCS > 57 | Bingeing | Laxatives | Disease | Low-energy eating | Do it | Binge eating and you will sickness | Early in the day texas | ||
Note. Logins = number of logins to ProYouth; Monitorings = number of completed monitoring questionnaires; Discussion board postings = number of contributions to the forum; Chats = participation in online counseling chat session (group or individual); Page strikes = number of pages accessed in the participant area (i. e., after login); Message board visits = number of pages accessed in the forum (i. e., after login); WCS = Weight Concerns Scale; tx = treatment; OR = odds ratio; rspearman = Spearman rank correlations; CI = confidence interval; **p <. 01. | ||||||||||
Logins | rspearman | .18** | .21** | .13** | .04** | .14** | .15** | .00 | .14** | .14** |
Monitorings | rspearman | .23** | .22** | .13** | .07** | .14** | .17** | .02 | .17** | .14** |
Page hits | rspearman | .17** | .21** | .14** | .05** | .14** | .14** | .00 | .14** | .15** |
Forum visits | rspearman | .18** | .25** | .17** | .13** | .20** | .19** | .01 | .20** | .23** |
Forum posts | Or [CI] | cuatro.3 [2.3–8.1] | 5.3 [3.6–eight.9] | 2.seven [step one.9–4.0] | 3.7 [2.2–6.1] | 4.step three [dos.9–six.4] | step three.8 [2.5–5.7] | 1.dos [0.8–step 1.7] | Or = 3.8 [dos.5–5.8] | Or = 5.step 3 [step 3.5–8.0] |
Chats | Otherwise [CI] | 47.eight [six.6–341] | 10.6 [6.5–17.1] | step 3.8 [dos.5–5.7] | 2.six [1.5–cuatro.7] | 5.cuatro [step three.6–8.2] | 7.5 [4.6–twelve.4] | step 1.4 [1.0–dos.1] | Otherwise = 4.6 [step 3.0–7.1] | Otherwise = 2.nine [step 1.8–4.7] |